![]() |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am thinking about selling my G3 iBook and wanted to erase the 40GB internal drive for data security. I inserted the Panther install disk (I don't have a retail version of Tiger), ran the installer, opened Disk Utility, went to "Erase", and under "options" chose the 8x random write option. Twenty four hours later the progress bar had crawled up to about 1/4 of the way but I was in no hurry. Another day later I noticed that the text next to the progress bar had changed from something like "Writing random data" to "Creating Partition Map". The progress bar was only about 50% and there was no disk activity. Another twelve hours or so and nothing had happened. The cursor was in SPOD mode so I held down the power button and then started up again. Since I had no OS any more it started up from the install disk, but I don't now whether it really finished writing over the whole disk or only got half way. I wasn't prepared to wait another three days to find out if the same thing would happen again so I opened Disk Utility again and this time just chose the less secure option to "Zero all data", which should be about 8 times quicker. It is making fairly rapid progress and I should know in a few hours whether it has cleanly completed. Anyone else experienced anything like this? Ian -- Ian Gregory http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/ |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <4usis1F19dsglU1@mid.individual.net>, Ian Gregory <foo@bar.invalid> wrote: > I am thinking about selling my G3 iBook and wanted to erase the 40GB > internal drive for data security. I inserted the Panther install disk > (I don't have a retail version of Tiger), ran the installer, opened > Disk Utility, went to "Erase", and under "options" chose the 8x random > write option. Twenty four hours later the progress bar had crawled up > to about 1/4 of the way but I was in no hurry. Another day later I > noticed that the text next to the progress bar had changed from > something like "Writing random data" to "Creating Partition Map". The > progress bar was only about 50% and there was no disk activity. Another > twelve hours or so and nothing had happened. The cursor was in SPOD mode > so I held down the power button and then started up again. Since I had > no OS any more it started up from the install disk, but I don't > now whether it really finished writing over the whole disk or only > got half way. I wasn't prepared to wait another three days to find > out if the same thing would happen again so I opened Disk Utility > again and this time just chose the less secure option to "Zero all > data", which should be about 8 times quicker. It is making fairly > rapid progress and I should know in a few hours whether it has > cleanly completed. Anyone else experienced anything like this? as you've noticed, the built-in secure erase is ridiculously slow, so much so that it is not even usable. i often wonder if anyone at apple ever tested it! fortunately, there are other secure erase utilities that run at a more acceptable speed. check versiontracker. also, unless the person to whom you are selling it is *really* interested in what was on there and wants to expend the time and money to recover it, zeroing the drive should be sufficient. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Ian Gregory <foo@bar.invalid> wrote: > I am thinking about selling my G3 iBook and wanted to erase the 40GB > internal drive for data security. I inserted the Panther install disk > (I don't have a retail version of Tiger), ran the installer, opened > Disk Utility, went to "Erase", and under "options" chose the 8x random > write option. Twenty four hours later the progress bar had crawled up > to about 1/4 of the way but I was in no hurry. Another day later I > noticed that the text next to the progress bar had changed from > something like "Writing random data" to "Creating Partition Map". The > progress bar was only about 50% and there was no disk activity. Another > twelve hours or so and nothing had happened. The cursor was in SPOD mode > so I held down the power button and then started up again. Since I had > no OS any more it started up from the install disk, but I don't > now whether it really finished writing over the whole disk or only > got half way. I wasn't prepared to wait another three days to find > out if the same thing would happen again so I opened Disk Utility > again and this time just chose the less secure option to "Zero all > data", which should be about 8 times quicker. It is making fairly > rapid progress and I should know in a few hours whether it has > cleanly completed. Anyone else experienced anything like this? I've only ever used "zero all data". I didn't find it slow. I am not the NSA so I don't know how secure it is. m. -- matt neuburg, phd = matt@tidbits.com, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/ Tiger - http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/tiger-customizing.html AppleScript - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596102119 Read TidBITS! It's free and smart. http://www.tidbits.com |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| matt neuburg <matt@tidbits.com> wrote: > I've only ever used "zero all data". I didn't find it slow. I am not the > NSA so I don't know how secure it is. m. I have found the really, really quick way to securely erase sensitive data when wiping a drive is to make sure all sensitive files are in my home folder, turn on FileVault, and then just do a quick erase without zeroing. Even if the FileVault image gets recovered, the data inside is still secure. -- K. Lang may your lum reek. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote: > I have found the really, really quick way to securely erase sensitive > data when wiping a drive is to make sure all sensitive files are in my > home folder, turn on FileVault, and then just do a quick erase without > zeroing. Even if the FileVault image gets recovered, the data > inside is still secure. Good hint! Thanks. -- /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Jon <see_signature@mac.com.invalid> wrote: > Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote: > > > I have found the really, really quick way to securely erase sensitive > > data when wiping a drive is to make sure all sensitive files are in my > > home folder, turn on FileVault, and then just do a quick erase without > > zeroing. Even if the FileVault image gets recovered, the data > > inside is still secure. > > Good hint! Thanks. That *is* a good hint. FileVault might be over the top, though; typically you've only got a few sensitive files, and it suffices to keep them all in an encrypted disk image. We covered that technique here: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8578> m. -- matt neuburg, phd = matt@tidbits.com, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/ Tiger - http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/tiger-customizing.html AppleScript - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596102119 Read TidBITS! It's free and smart. http://www.tidbits.com |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <Jqeih.74112$YV4.10653@edtnps89>, me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) wrote: > matt neuburg <matt@tidbits.com> wrote: > > I've only ever used "zero all data". I didn't find it slow. I am not the > > NSA so I don't know how secure it is. m. > > I have found the really, really quick way to securely erase sensitive > data when wiping a drive is to make sure all sensitive files are in my > home folder, turn on FileVault, and then just do a quick erase without > zeroing. Even if the FileVault image gets recovered, the data > inside is still secure. The big question is what does Filevault do with your old files after they are moved to the encrypted image, as it sounds like it copies them over: "You need at least as much space as your home folder takes up. For example, if your home folder is 20 MB, make sure you have at least 20 MB of free space available." This would be secure only if Filevault securely erased the previous files when it moved them to the image. I would hope so, but don't know exactly how it works. Steve |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In article <Jqeih.74112$YV4.10653@edtnps89>, me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) wrote: > matt neuburg <matt@tidbits.com> wrote: > > I've only ever used "zero all data". I didn't find it slow. I am not the > > NSA so I don't know how secure it is. m. > > I have found the really, really quick way to securely erase sensitive > data when wiping a drive is to make sure all sensitive files are in my > home folder, turn on FileVault, and then just do a quick erase without > zeroing. Even if the FileVault image gets recovered, the data > inside is still secure. It seems to me that the data would be copied into FileVault, being encrypted in the process. Wouldn't a hacker be able to access the files where they were located prior to encryption? Zeroing the drive wouldn't hurt. Fred |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Fred McKenzie <fmmck@aol.com> wrote: > It seems to me that the data would be copied into FileVault, being > encrypted in the process. Wouldn't a hacker be able to access the files > where they were located prior to encryption? Zeroing the drive wouldn't > hurt. One has to remember to check "Use secure erase" when turning on FileVault. That will securely erase everything that was copied to the FileVault disk image. Unless ones home folder is very large, it should take less time than zeroing the whole disk. -- K. Lang may your lum reek. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Steve Jones <jones948@hotmail.com> wrote: > This would be secure only if Filevault securely erased the previous > files when it moved them to the image. I would hope so, but don't know > exactly how it works. It does. How secure _that_ erasing is, I do not know though. -- /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|