In article <g8IOa.45$Pd2.1056[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
"John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:

> Brian Lewis wrote:
> > In article <%YHOa.42$Pd2.1080[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
> > "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://news.com.com/2100-1046_3-1023167.html?tag=cd_mh
> >>
> >>
> >> Looks like if a products Mac share gets down to the 10% range or so
> >> Adobe will kill it. Photoshop is down to 30% and dropping every
> >> year. If the rate of decline is not slowed Photoshop will be a
> >> goner on Mac in about 3 years.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course the loss of Premiere doen't really hurt Mac owners. They
> >> still have the user unfriendly FCP4 to use. As I recall the main
> >> designer of Premiere designed FCP originally. No wonder both are
> >> such junk.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Ummmm premiere sucked ass, PC or Mac.
> >
> > Then again, if you ever had any experience with anything of which you
> > speak, you might not come off as such an ass.
>
>
>
> Once again you have demonstrated you cannot read. What was the last
> sentence I wrote in the post you quoted. Let me repeat it again. "No
> wonder both are such junk". It means that FCP and Premiere are both user
> unfriendly junk designed by the same guy originally.
>
>

Now by your logic since MS came up with the abomination of MS-BOB, every
other piece of software authored by MS is an abomination. As much as I'd
like to say it's true, it's not. VS.NET is a superb IDE.

It's quite simple, if your product sucks, people won't buy it. If a
superior product that doesn't suck is available, people will buy it.

Let's see you back up your claim that FCP is junk.

It's not, premiere is.

You're on the wrong side of the fact fence winnie.

Brian Lewis wrote:
> In article <g8IOa.45$Pd2.1056[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> Brian Lewis wrote:
>>> In article <%YHOa.42$Pd2.1080[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
>>> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://news.com.com/2100-1046_3-1023167.html?tag=cd_mh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like if a products Mac share gets down to the 10% range or so
>>>> Adobe will kill it. Photoshop is down to 30% and dropping every
>>>> year. If the rate of decline is not slowed Photoshop will be a
>>>> goner on Mac in about 3 years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course the loss of Premiere doen't really hurt Mac owners.
>>>> They still have the user unfriendly FCP4 to use. As I recall the
>>>> main designer of Premiere designed FCP originally. No wonder both
>>>> are
>>>> such junk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ummmm premiere sucked ass, PC or Mac.
>>>
>>> Then again, if you ever had any experience with anything of which
>>> you speak, you might not come off as such an ass.
>>
>>
>>
>> Once again you have demonstrated you cannot read. What was the last
>> sentence I wrote in the post you quoted. Let me repeat it again.
>> "No wonder both are such junk". It means that FCP and Premiere are
>> both user unfriendly junk designed by the same guy originally.
>>
>>
>
> Now by your logic since MS came up with the abomination of MS-BOB,
> every other piece of software authored by MS is an abomination. As
> much as I'd like to say it's true, it's not. VS.NET is a superb IDE.
>
> It's quite simple, if your product sucks, people won't buy it. If a
> superior product that doesn't suck is available, people will buy it.
>

We are for once in total agreement. I always wondered why Windows XP
was far more popular than Mac OS X. Brian you spelled it out
perfectly.

In article <7YIOa.46$Pd2.1018[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
"John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:

> Brian Lewis wrote:
> > In article <g8IOa.45$Pd2.1056[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
> > "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Brian Lewis wrote:
> >>> In article <%YHOa.42$Pd2.1080[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
> >>> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> http://news.com.com/2100-1046_3-1023167.html?tag=cd_mh
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like if a products Mac share gets down to the 10% range or so
> >>>> Adobe will kill it. Photoshop is down to 30% and dropping every
> >>>> year. If the rate of decline is not slowed Photoshop will be a
> >>>> goner on Mac in about 3 years.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course the loss of Premiere doen't really hurt Mac owners.
> >>>> They still have the user unfriendly FCP4 to use. As I recall the
> >>>> main designer of Premiere designed FCP originally. No wonder both
> >>>> are
> >>>> such junk.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Ummmm premiere sucked ass, PC or Mac.
> >>>
> >>> Then again, if you ever had any experience with anything of which
> >>> you speak, you might not come off as such an ass.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Once again you have demonstrated you cannot read. What was the last
> >> sentence I wrote in the post you quoted. Let me repeat it again.
> >> "No wonder both are such junk". It means that FCP and Premiere are
> >> both user unfriendly junk designed by the same guy originally.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Now by your logic since MS came up with the abomination of MS-BOB,
> > every other piece of software authored by MS is an abomination. As
> > much as I'd like to say it's true, it's not. VS.NET is a superb IDE.

Note, no response. I assume you agree that everything MS makes is an
abomination then?

> >
> > It's quite simple, if your product sucks, people won't buy it. If a
> > superior product that doesn't suck is available, people will buy it.
> >
>
> We are for once in total agreement. I always wondered why Windows XP
> was far more popular than Mac OS X. Brian you spelled it out
> perfectly.
>

So you agree that FCP is a superior product to premiere then? Good.
That's progress.

Brian Lewis wrote:
> In article <7YIOa.46$Pd2.1018[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> Brian Lewis wrote:
>>> In article <g8IOa.45$Pd2.1056[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
>>> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Brian Lewis wrote:
>>>>> In article <%YHOa.42$Pd2.1080[at]newsfeed.avtel.net>,
>>>>> "John" <nospam[at]nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://news.com.com/2100-1046_3-1023167.html?tag=cd_mh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like if a products Mac share gets down to the 10% range or
>>>>>> so Adobe will kill it. Photoshop is down to 30% and dropping
>>>>>> every year. If the rate of decline is not slowed Photoshop will
>>>>>> be a goner on Mac in about 3 years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the loss of Premiere doen't really hurt Mac owners.
>>>>>> They still have the user unfriendly FCP4 to use. As I recall the
>>>>>> main designer of Premiere designed FCP originally. No wonder
>>>>>> both are
>>>>>> such junk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ummmm premiere sucked ass, PC or Mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then again, if you ever had any experience with anything of which
>>>>> you speak, you might not come off as such an ass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Once again you have demonstrated you cannot read. What was the
>>>> last sentence I wrote in the post you quoted. Let me repeat it
>>>> again. "No wonder both are such junk". It means that FCP and
>>>> Premiere are both user unfriendly junk designed by the same guy
>>>> originally.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Now by your logic since MS came up with the abomination of MS-BOB,
>>> every other piece of software authored by MS is an abomination. As
>>> much as I'd like to say it's true, it's not. VS.NET is a superb IDE.
>
> Note, no response. I assume you agree that everything MS makes is an
> abomination then?
>
>>>
>>> It's quite simple, if your product sucks, people won't buy it. If a
>>> superior product that doesn't suck is available, people will buy it.
>>>
>>
>> We are for once in total agreement. I always wondered why Windows XP
>> was far more popular than Mac OS X. Brian you spelled it out
>> perfectly.
>>
>
> So you agree that FCP is a superior product to premiere then? Good.
> That's progress.


Every video app I have ever used is superior to Premiere. But FCP is
superior by only a small amount. Both require a high degree of training
to use effectively. Unlike Vegas 4 which you can figure out how to do
something without resorting to the manual. Far more user friendly app.