Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like old
computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)

We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.

http://www.retrohacker.com

---
http://www.retrohacker.com
Nostalgia for the computer enthusiast of yesteryear.
Amiga 1000, Commodore 64, Original Macintosh, Apple ][, TI-99/4A and more!

Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:

>Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like old
>computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>
>We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>
>http://www.retrohacker.com
>

Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.

In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:

> Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>
> >Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like old
> >computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
> >
> >We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
> >purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
> >
> >http://www.retrohacker.com
> >
>
> Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.

Figures.

--
Regards,
JP
"The measure of a man is what he will do while expecting that he will get nothing in return!"

Macintosh for productivity. Linux for servers. Palm/Visor for mobility. Windows to feed the Black Hole in your IT budget

Jim Polaski wrote in
<jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:

>In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
> Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim Polaski wrote in
>> <jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>
>> >In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
>> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>> >>
>> >> >Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like
>> >> >old
>> >> >computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>> >> >
>> >> >We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>> >> >purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>> >> >
>> >> >http://www.retrohacker.com
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
>> >
>> >Figures.
>>
>> "Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
>> pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
>> than your wristwatch.
>
>I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
>that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
>bad day, which even you have.

Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
matter whether you are interacting with it.

>But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.

I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
module and working GUI.

In article <eg4rgv0crg9cfe9r8pn35rjjog6inddlb9[at]4ax.com>,
Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:

> Jim Polaski wrote in
> <jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>
> >In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jim Polaski wrote in
> >> <jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
> >>
> >> >In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
> >> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who
> >> >> >like
> >> >> >old
> >> >> >computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
> >> >> >purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >http://www.retrohacker.com
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
> >> >
> >> >Figures.
> >>
> >> "Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
> >> pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
> >> than your wristwatch.
> >
> >I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
> >that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
> >bad day, which even you have.
>
> Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
> your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
> matter whether you are interacting with it.

Entirely mechanical. I wind it every day. No day, date, just the time.
Omega Speedmaster

>
> >But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.
>
> I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
> I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
> kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
> module and working GUI.

Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.

--
Regards,
JP
"The measure of a man is what he will do while expecting that he will get nothing in return!"

Macintosh for productivity. Linux for servers. Palm/Visor for mobility. Windows to feed the Black Hole in your IT budget

Jim Polaski wrote in
<jpolaski-B45D3C.12570910072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:

>In article <eg4rgv0crg9cfe9r8pn35rjjog6inddlb9[at]4ax.com>,
> Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim Polaski wrote in
>> <jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>
>> >In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
>> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jim Polaski wrote in
>> >> <jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
>> >> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who
>> >> >> >like
>> >> >> >old
>> >> >> >computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>> >> >> >purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >http://www.retrohacker.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
>> >> >
>> >> >Figures.
>> >>
>> >> "Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
>> >> pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
>> >> than your wristwatch.
>> >
>> >I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
>> >that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
>> >bad day, which even you have.
>>
>> Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
>> your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
>> matter whether you are interacting with it.
>
>Entirely mechanical. I wind it every day. No day, date, just the time.
>Omega Speedmaster

That's why I said "most likely". ;-)

>>
>> >But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.
>>
>> I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>> I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>> kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>> module and working GUI.
>
>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.

Nah, it's nostalgia.

Steve Hanson wrote:

> Jim Polaski wrote in
> <jpolaski-B45D3C.12570910072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>
>
>>In article <eg4rgv0crg9cfe9r8pn35rjjog6inddlb9[at]4ax.com>,
>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jim Polaski wrote in
>>><jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
>>>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Jim Polaski wrote in
>>>>><jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
>>>>>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who
>>>>>>>>like
>>>>>>>>old
>>>>>>>>computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>>>>>>>>purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.retrohacker.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Figures.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
>>>>>pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
>>>>>than your wristwatch.
>>>>
>>>>I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
>>>>that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
>>>>bad day, which even you have.
>>>
>>>Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
>>>your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
>>>matter whether you are interacting with it.
>>
>>Entirely mechanical. I wind it every day. No day, date, just the time.
>>Omega Speedmaster
>
>
> That's why I said "most likely". ;-)
>
>
>>>>But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.
>>>
>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>>>module and working GUI.
>>
>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>
>
> Nah, it's nostalgia.

Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made, but
you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(

--
If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... oh wait, he does.

Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:

>>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>>>>module and working GUI.
>>>
>>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>>
>>
>> Nah, it's nostalgia.
>
>Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made, but
>you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(

This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
prescriptions.

In article <ldn5hvs6edbadrr1m1nphr0g93n6ccp2qo[at]4ax.com>,
Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:

> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>
> >>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
> >>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
> >>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
> >>>>module and working GUI.
> >>>
> >>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
> >>
> >>
> >> Nah, it's nostalgia.
> >
> >Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made,
> >but
> >you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>
> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
> prescriptions.

What're you talking about, Steve? Don't sell yourself short here,(it's
really not your style). Why, you fill all the prescriptions the
constituents of this NG require on a daily basis... laughter still is
the best medicine ya know.

Steve

Steve Hanson wrote:

> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>
>
>>>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>>>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>>>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>>>>>module and working GUI.
>>>>
>>>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>>>
>>>
>>>Nah, it's nostalgia.
>>
>>Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made, but
>>you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>
>
> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
> prescriptions.

No, but you could buy me some twinkies.

--
If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... oh wait, he does.

Steve Hanson wrote:
> Jim Polaski wrote in
> <jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>
>
>>In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jim Polaski wrote in
>>><jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
>>>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like
>>>>>>old
>>>>>>computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>>>>>>purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.retrohacker.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
>>>>
>>>>Figures.
>>>
>>>"Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
>>>pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
>>>than your wristwatch.
>>
>>I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
>>that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
>>bad day, which even you have.
>
>
> Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
> your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
> matter whether you are interacting with it.
>
>
>>But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.
>
>
> I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
> I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
> kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
> module and working GUI.

You're probably so nostalgic about the c64 because it's the first computer you
whacked off to. Back when you could still see your winkie.

--
If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... oh wait, he does.

Steve Carroll wrote in
<fretwizz-8DDA3E.11060314072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:

>In article <ldn5hvs6edbadrr1m1nphr0g93n6ccp2qo[at]4ax.com>,
> Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>
>> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>>
>> >>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>> >>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>> >>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>> >>>>module and working GUI.
>> >>>
>> >>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Nah, it's nostalgia.
>> >
>> >Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made,
>> >but
>> >you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>>
>> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
>> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
>> prescriptions.
>
>What're you talking about, Steve? Don't sell yourself short here,(it's
>really not your style). Why, you fill all the prescriptions the
>constituents of this NG require on a daily basis... laughter still is
>the best medicine ya know.

I couldn't do it without you to take the pratfalls, Steve.

Elizabot wrote in <3f130f23$0$203$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:

>Steve Hanson wrote:
>
>> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>>
>>
>>>>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>>>>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>>>>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>>>>>>module and working GUI.
>>>>>
>>>>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Nah, it's nostalgia.
>>>
>>>Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made, but
>>>you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>>
>>
>> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
>> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
>> prescriptions.
>
>No, but you could buy me some twinkies.

What's the word? Enabler. I don't want to be your enabler,
sugar-pie.

Elizabot wrote in <3f130f2d$0$203$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:

>Steve Hanson wrote:
>> Jim Polaski wrote in
>> <jpolaski-8A9CD3.00373010072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>
>>
>>>In article <obkpgv4qk8gfbr6pppk3tpnkkkcqll97tr[at]4ax.com>,
>>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jim Polaski wrote in
>>>><jpolaski-C16DF6.20033608072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <cvcmgvot57uboohumdn2qm0tq8abfa8tfs[at]4ax.com>,
>>>>>Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Chris Russo wrote in <kyEOa.7521$sY2.4139[at]rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hey guys, we put together some really funny T-shirts for people who like
>>>>>>>old
>>>>>>>computers (original mac, ti-99, c64, etc.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>We're basically just a couple of geeks trying to fund our old computer
>>>>>>>purchasing habit. :) Some check it out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.retrohacker.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cute. I might buy one of the C64 ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>Figures.
>>>>
>>>>"Figures"? Show some respect, Oh Math-Challenged One. I did some
>>>>pretty nifty stuff on a computer that had less computational power
>>>>than your wristwatch.
>>>
>>>I don't use my wristwatch for anything computational. My Speedmaster
>>>that is. And yes, I was dismal point challenged in that post. It was a
>>>bad day, which even you have.
>>
>>
>> Your wristwatch still does some computing, most likely. Just like
>> your Mac still burns cycles whenever the Finder seizes up. Doesn't
>> matter whether you are interacting with it.
>>
>>
>>>But as to the t-shirt, you need a Wintel, 1st gen 1980 IBM PC clearly.
>>
>>
>> I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>> I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>> kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>> module and working GUI.
>
>You're probably so nostalgic about the c64 because it's the first computer you
>whacked off to. Back when you could still see your winkie.

No, a friend of mine owned a Timex Sinclair and we circle jerked to
that.

In article <09o8hvk6r729lbtiqgt0s41po4ar0gn96b[at]4ax.com>,
Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:

> Steve Carroll wrote in
> <fretwizz-8DDA3E.11060314072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>
> >In article <ldn5hvs6edbadrr1m1nphr0g93n6ccp2qo[at]4ax.com>,
> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
> >>
> >> >>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
> >> >>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
> >> >>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
> >> >>>>module and working GUI.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Nah, it's nostalgia.
> >> >
> >> >Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made,
> >> >but
> >> >you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
> >>
> >> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
> >> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
> >> prescriptions.
> >
> >What're you talking about, Steve? Don't sell yourself short here,(it's
> >really not your style). Why, you fill all the prescriptions the
> >constituents of this NG require on a daily basis... laughter still is
> >the best medicine ya know.
>
> I couldn't do it without you to take the pratfalls, Steve.

Wow, you're really funny, Steve. The next time we start talking about
personalities in here and who could use a 'transport', we'll do well to
remember who the 'authority' on the subject is.

Steve

Steve Hanson wrote:

> Elizabot wrote in <3f130f23$0$203$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>
>
>>Steve Hanson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>>>>>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>>>>>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>>>>>>>module and working GUI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Nah, it's nostalgia.
>>>>
>>>>Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made, but
>>>>you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
>>>week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
>>>prescriptions.
>>
>>No, but you could buy me some twinkies.
>
>
> What's the word? Enabler. I don't want to be your enabler,
> sugar-pie.

Me neither. Maybe I should quit responding to your posts.

--
If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... oh wait, he does.

Steve Carroll wrote in
<fretwizz-23F3EB.16205315072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:

>In article <09o8hvk6r729lbtiqgt0s41po4ar0gn96b[at]4ax.com>,
> Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve Carroll wrote in
>> <fretwizz-8DDA3E.11060314072003[at]netnews.attbi.com>:
>>
>> >In article <ldn5hvs6edbadrr1m1nphr0g93n6ccp2qo[at]4ax.com>,
>> > Steve Hanson <icustomercare[at]usps.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Elizabot wrote in <3f0ef5a7$0$199$75868355[at]news.frii.net>:
>> >>
>> >> >>>>I never owned one, why would I buy a t-shirt celebrating a computer
>> >> >>>>I've never used? The Commodore 64 is great in an 80s retro- computing
>> >> >>>>kind of way, and I used the hell out of mine--complete with 128K RAM
>> >> >>>>module and working GUI.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Heck, by this resoning you might was well go for an abacus.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nah, it's nostalgia.
>> >> >
>> >> >Thinking of a time when you were happy? What's wrong? You've got it made,
>> >> >but
>> >> >you're still not happy. Poor Steve. :-(
>> >>
>> >> This sounds like your internal monologue. If you didn't have a nice
>> >> week, whine about it to your therapist, not me. I can't refill your
>> >> prescriptions.
>> >
>> >What're you talking about, Steve? Don't sell yourself short here,(it's
>> >really not your style). Why, you fill all the prescriptions the
>> >constituents of this NG require on a daily basis... laughter still is
>> >the best medicine ya know.
>>
>> I couldn't do it without you to take the pratfalls, Steve.
>
>Wow, you're really funny, Steve.

I know.