In article <3F0A3EFD.3AB3FC0A[at]nospam.idiom.com>,
"John C. Randolph" <jcr[at]nospam.idiom.com> wrote:

> For the record: Monday came and went, and 'Justin' did not look up my
> machine accounts in NetInfo and mail them to me.

I'm not surprised.

Assuming that he does work at Apple, I bet he would not appreciate a
copy of this thread being mailed to his supervisor.

--
Woofbert, Chief Rocket Surgeon, Infernosoft
Woofbert's Law on Learning Linux: When attempting to learn Linux,
study it thoroughly before you begin.

Woofbert wrote:
>
> In article <3F0A3EFD.3AB3FC0A[at]nospam.idiom.com>,
> "John C. Randolph" <jcr[at]nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
>
> > For the record: Monday came and went, and 'Justin' did not look up my
> > machine accounts in NetInfo and mail them to me.
>
> I'm not surprised.
>
> Assuming that he does work at Apple, I bet he would not appreciate a
> copy of this thread being mailed to his supervisor.

I doubt that his supervisor would care. If he's not leaking
confidential information, it's really not an issue if he's trolling a newsgroup.

-jcr

"John C. Randolph" <jcr[at]nospam.idiom.com> wrote in message news:<3F0A5D82.D48A612C[at]nospam.idiom.com>...
> Woofbert wrote:
> >
> > In article <3F0A3EFD.3AB3FC0A[at]nospam.idiom.com>,
> > "John C. Randolph" <jcr[at]nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > For the record: Monday came and went, and 'Justin' did not look up my
> > > machine accounts in NetInfo and mail them to me.
> >
> > I'm not surprised.
> >
> > Assuming that he does work at Apple, I bet he would not appreciate a
> > copy of this thread being mailed to his supervisor.
>
> I doubt that his supervisor would care. If he's not leaking
> confidential information, it's really not an issue if he's trolling a newsgroup.

Actually, *somebody* should care. I am reminded of the "WorkerBee"
incident of some time ago.

Not that this clown isn't one of our regular wintrollers with a new
bit, of course.

=Heywood=

In article <dd5de929.0307080734.ae3ac87[at]posting.google.com>,
imouttahere[at]mac.com (Heywood Mogroot) wrote:

> >
> > I doubt that his supervisor would care. If he's not leaking
> > confidential information, it's really not an issue if he's trolling a
> > newsgroup.
>
> Actually, *somebody* should care. I am reminded of the "WorkerBee"
> incident of some time ago.
>
> Not that this clown isn't one of our regular wintrollers with a new
> bit, of course.


What was the workerbee incident?