Steve Hanson
07-07-2003, 08:23 PM
Ruffin Bailey wrote in
<172e9d35.0307060709.3dfb00f6[at]posting.google.com>:
>I realize there are the NASA benchmarks with one 2 GHz turned off
>(from which you could scale and get a rough idea what's going on) and
>a few 1.6/1.8 numbers at Apple, but has anyone really seen a good test
>of performance from the 1.6 & 1.8 G5 models? Even an Xbench score?
>Seems like everything from WWDC is all 2 GHz duallies.
>
>Fwiw, at least one Apple sales feller at 1-800-MY-APPLE (or whatever
>it is) has said that orders so far as "99% 2 GHz dual processor
>Powermacs". Thought that was interesting. If only $1000 extra would
>fall into my lap...
Look under your brain. An Apple SALESMAN tells you 99% of sales are
of the most expensive model. Gee, I *might* be skeptical.
<172e9d35.0307060709.3dfb00f6[at]posting.google.com>:
>I realize there are the NASA benchmarks with one 2 GHz turned off
>(from which you could scale and get a rough idea what's going on) and
>a few 1.6/1.8 numbers at Apple, but has anyone really seen a good test
>of performance from the 1.6 & 1.8 G5 models? Even an Xbench score?
>Seems like everything from WWDC is all 2 GHz duallies.
>
>Fwiw, at least one Apple sales feller at 1-800-MY-APPLE (or whatever
>it is) has said that orders so far as "99% 2 GHz dual processor
>Powermacs". Thought that was interesting. If only $1000 extra would
>fall into my lap...
Look under your brain. An Apple SALESMAN tells you 99% of sales are
of the most expensive model. Gee, I *might* be skeptical.