In article <r8iegv0p1grnsr621iab7tcdc29jo73ab3[at]4ax.com>, foo
<foo[at]bar.com> wrote:

> Yes. And starting at 400-500K/s seems to be plenty fast. It would
> take 8:1 to get to 50K/s, and that's the very upper limit of most
> people's bandwidth. It would take about 20:1 to get into the 16K/s
> range, and 80:1 to get to the 4K/s range.

Wha?

I watch 300K video streams all the time.

Wade

On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:29:55 -0500, Wade Williams
<wade[at]remove.spam.dogwatchsw.com> wrote:

>In article <r8iegv0p1grnsr621iab7tcdc29jo73ab3[at]4ax.com>, foo
><foo[at]bar.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. And starting at 400-500K/s seems to be plenty fast. It would
>> take 8:1 to get to 50K/s, and that's the very upper limit of most
>> people's bandwidth. It would take about 20:1 to get into the 16K/s
>> range, and 80:1 to get to the 4K/s range.
>
>Wha?
>
>I watch 300K video streams all the time.

(...which has absolutely nothing to do with anything I posted...)