On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 15:37:57 -0400, "Dan Johnson"
<danieljohnson[at]vzavenue.net> wrote:

>"John Jones" <jjones[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:sufggv8cgtdse11cqmve7gt0hq493i5h8i[at]4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 07:09:52 -0400, "Dan Johnson"
>> <danieljohnson[at]vzavenue.net> wrote:
>> >> That's not exactly.
>> >
>> >I gave you the details repeatedly. The inlining thing, remember?
>>
>> No, you did not give any details. I've asked various times for
>> clarification and what did I get? Statements to the effect:
>>
>> "Enough rope to hang yourself"
>> "You're just being silly"
>> "aplomb"
>
>This would be easier to credit if you were not asking
>questions about my detailed claim in another post at
>about the same time.
>
>Remember, the key to straw man arguments is *time*;
>you've got to put some distance between the argument
>you want to misrepresent and your post, or it will be
>all to obvious what you are doing.

Ah. More personal attacks. Keep them up...each one solidifies your
defeat a little more.

>> >I apologize; I was frustrated with your constant misrepresentation
>> >of my position, and I said some thing I really should not have said.
>>
>> My "misrepresentation" is merely your lack of factual argument. You're
>> mistakenly projecting your failure onto me.
>
>Ah, well, I guess you aren't really throwing in the towel
>quite yet.

Why would I throw in the towel after I've already won?

jj

>
>> >But I do still think your argument gave out before mine did. :D
>

"John Jones" <jjones[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ij6hgvk573938pg8eg56rc60haq8b20kt9[at]4ax.com...
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 15:37:57 -0400, "Dan Johnson"
> <danieljohnson[at]vzavenue.net> wrote:
> >Remember, the key to straw man arguments is *time*;
> >you've got to put some distance between the argument
> >you want to misrepresent and your post, or it will be
> >all to obvious what you are doing.
>
> Ah. More personal attacks. Keep them up...each one solidifies your
> defeat a little more.

I'm just trying to help, my friend. It's good advice, whether
you find it offensive or not.

[snip]
> >Ah, well, I guess you aren't really throwing in the towel
> >quite yet.
>
> Why would I throw in the towel after I've already won?

Well, there's always the declare-victory-and-get-out
option. Worth a shot, I guess. :D

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:57:02 -0400, "Dan Johnson"
<danieljohnson[at]vzavenue.net> wrote:

>"John Jones" <jjones[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ij6hgvk573938pg8eg56rc60haq8b20kt9[at]4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 15:37:57 -0400, "Dan Johnson"
>> <danieljohnson[at]vzavenue.net> wrote:
>> >Remember, the key to straw man arguments is *time*;
>> >you've got to put some distance between the argument
>> >you want to misrepresent and your post, or it will be
>> >all to obvious what you are doing.
>>
>> Ah. More personal attacks. Keep them up...each one solidifies your
>> defeat a little more.
>
>I'm just trying to help, my friend.

You're helping a lot. You've aptly demonstrated that you had no case.
Otherwise you wouldn't have resorted to personal attacks.

>It's good advice, whether you find it offensive or not.

Where did I say that I found them offensive? I just stated that
they're a sure sign that you had no argument.

jj

>[snip]
>> >Ah, well, I guess you aren't really throwing in the towel
>> >quite yet.
>>
>> Why would I throw in the towel after I've already won?
>
>Well, there's always the declare-victory-and-get-out
>option. Worth a shot, I guess. :D
>