In article <flippo-46C79E.07384306072003[at]news.central.cox.net>,
flip <flippo[at]mac.com> wrote:

> > > 1) GCC is not the best compiler Apple can manage.
> > >
> >
> > Ok, then the day of wwdc, what compiler would of produced a higher score
> > for the power mac g5 running macos 10.2.7?
>
> Presumably IBM's.

So you presume that IBM AIX compiler would work for macos 10.2.7? I
honestly do not know, but would assume a AIX compiler would not work on
10.2.7. Can anyone confirm or deny this?

In article <flippo-9B6361.16490606072003[at]news.central.cox.net>,
flip <flippo[at]mac.com> wrote:

> In article <no-9C5DD1.13475006072003[at]newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
> no <no[at]no.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <flippo-46C79E.07384306072003[at]news.central.cox.net>,
> > flip <flippo[at]mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > 1) GCC is not the best compiler Apple can manage.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, then the day of wwdc, what compiler would of produced a higher
> > > > score
> > > > for the power mac g5 running macos 10.2.7?
> > >
> > > Presumably IBM's.
> >
> > So you presume that IBM AIX compiler would work for macos 10.2.7? I
> > honestly do not know, but would assume a AIX compiler would not work on
> > 10.2.7. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>
> Who said Mac OS 10.2.7?

You are kidding right? Lets try this again:
" Ok, then the day of wwdc, what compiler would of produced a higher
score for the power mac g5 running macos 10.2.7?



<you said> Presumably IBM's.