In article <050720032341045063%hsluiman[at]seaweed.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Hans Sluiman <hsluiman[at]seaweed.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <1fxmwmj.hfkgwl1dunj36N%{$usenet$}[at]apple-juice.co.uk>, D.M.
> Procida <{$usenet$}[at]apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:

> Rhinotek produces an ink cartridge
[...]
Yep, but the question concerns the power adaptor...
TA

In article <Titus_Atomicus-C1C404.21581706072003[at]gw3.news.tpi.pl>,
<Titus_Atomicus[at]somewhere.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <050720032341045063%hsluiman[at]seaweed.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> Hans Sluiman <hsluiman[at]seaweed.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In article <1fxmwmj.hfkgwl1dunj36N%{$usenet$}[at]apple-juice.co.uk>, D.M.
> > Procida <{$usenet$}[at]apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Rhinotek produces an ink cartridge
> [...]
> Yep, but the question concerns the power adaptor...
> TA

Correct but if there exists a Canon equivalent of the SW 2200 (maybe
the 2200 is a rebadged Canon printer, only guessing) the cartridge
compatibility info would help to identify the equivalent Canon
printer(s) whose power adaptors might also work with the 2200.

So in this case the cartridge info suggests that the JC-30/70/80 are
probably the nearest Canon equivalents of the SW 2200. This is what the
OP was asking for.

Hans

--
To reply by email, remove the marine vegetation