In article <pan.2003.08.16.19.03.11.113844[at]ix.netcom.com>,
"Patrick Mills" <plmills[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>
> 1) Is there another product like GC that is either Carbonized or written
> for Cocoa that is more mature than CurvusProX? I'm not talking about
> something like Mathematica or Maple (too expensive and not as easy or
> functional for my interests as GC), but something very much like GC.
>

Another option is CPlot http://www.stud.uni-goettingen.de/~s134159/cplot/
This is beta but seems fairly complete.

In article <kjbeath-7F38D2.09475117082003[at]news2.ozemail.com.au>,
Ken <kjbeath[at]kagi.com> wrote:

>In article <pan.2003.08.16.19.03.11.113844[at]ix.netcom.com>,
> "Patrick Mills" <plmills[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> 1) Is there another product like GC that is either Carbonized or written
>> for Cocoa that is more mature than CurvusProX? I'm not talking about
>> something like Mathematica or Maple (too expensive and not as easy or
>> functional for my interests as GC), but something very much like GC.
>>
>
>Another option is CPlot http://www.stud.uni-goettingen.de/~s134159/cplot/
>This is beta but seems fairly complete.


I highly recommend MathPad

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwidholm/MathPad/

--
Mark Wardle
Department of Physics
Macquarie University
wardle[at]physics.mq.edu.au

In article <wardle-BBFD90.18271020082003[at]sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au>, Mark
Wardle <wardle[at]removethis.physics.mq.edu.au> wrote:

> I highly recommend MathPad
>
> http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwidholm/MathPad/

I second that. It's much better than a calculator.

--
Lou Pecora
- My views are my own.